Replies to My Critics
نویسنده
چکیده
I thank my critics for time, thought, and effort put into their commentaries. Since obviously I can’t respond to everything, I will try to address what strike me as the most important questions they ask and objections they raise. I think I have decent answers to some questions and decent responses to some objections, in other cases it seems enough to clarify the relevant view, and in still others I need to modify the view in question. One complication, which I won’t elaborate on, is that the views under consideration have evolved, or at least changed, over the years, so that my critics are aiming at a moving target, albeit a slowly moving one. Before responding, I will sketch some of the main ideas behind my view, including their unifying motivation, and mention a few key distinctions that are particularly relevant to topics addressed by my critics.
منابع مشابه
Changing the Theory of Theory Change: Reply to My Critics
'Changing the Theory of Theory Change: Towards a Computational Approach' (Tennant [1994]; henceforth CTTQ claimed that the AGM postulate of recovery is false, and that AGM contractions of theories can be more than minimally mutilating. It also described an alternative, computational method for contracting theories, called the Staining Algorithm. Makinson [1995] and Hansson and Rott [1995] criti...
متن کاملPSYCHE: http://psyche.cs.monash.edu.au/ Reply to Gallagher: Different conceptions of embodiment
Let me begin by thanking both the Dorothée Legrand, the editor of this special issue, and Timothy Bayne, general editor of PSYCHE for their great and sustained efforts to make this debate possible. Everyone who has ever done this type of service to the philosophical community knows how much work it really is – I am therefore more than grateful to both of them, and I am certain that the same is ...
متن کاملReflections on Consequence
In The Concept of Logical Consequence (CLC) [13], I presented an extended argument that the standard, Tarskian analysis of logical consequence and logical truth is wrong. In the years since its publication, over a score of authors have written reviews, articles, or portions of books criticizing various arguments I gave in the book.1 Nearly all have presented what the authors considered devastat...
متن کاملAdequacy of authors’ replies to criticism raised in electronic letters to the editor: cohort study
OBJECTIVE To investigate whether substantive criticism in electronic letters to the editor, defined as a problem that could invalidate the research or reduce its reliability, is adequately addressed by the authors. DESIGN Cohort study. SETTING BMJ between October 2005 and September 2007. Inclusion criteria Research papers generating substantive criticism in the rapid responses section on bm...
متن کاملMental Files: Replies to my Critics
‘[An] aspect of Recanati’s proposal that is not entirely clear is its precise scope. For we are told that mental files are mental indexicals which depend, for their existence, on there being an epistemically rewarding relation, in the form of acquaintance, between a subject and the object the file is a file of. On the face of it, however, this would entail that mental files are quite limited, f...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2014